What you get
The conversations that close the gap.
Your report covers every dimension: preference gaps, clarity, and whether views are shared or split across the team. It names the critical attention areas, what’s driving them, and the exact conversation to run — with prompts and the decision to make. That’s the gap most surveys leave to you: they tell you something’s off; Team Syzygy tells you what to do about it.
One-minute summary
The strongest pattern is Balanced Workload vs Uneven Distribution: the current team norm leans toward uneven distribution while preferences lean toward balanced workload — and responses are split enough that the average may hide different definitions of fairness. Supporting signals (recognition, delivery focus, external demands) point the same way with low clarity, so workload fairness may be hard to resolve until the team makes those trade-offs explicit.
What to do next · For the manager
Open with: Workload fairness isn’t just whether work is uneven — people may agree it’s uneven but mean different things by “fair”, with only moderate clarity on the issue.
Then work through:
- Start withWorkload fairness as the topic, rather than jumping straight to rebalancing.
- ClarifyWhether “fair” means equal load, capacity-based, skill-based, or business-need allocation.
- DecideWhich version of fairness the team is actually choosing when work can’t be split equally.
- RecogniseWhat should be acknowledged when work is uneven by design.
“If work is uneven by design, what should be made visible and recognised so it doesn’t feel accidental?”
The full report also includes the questions to ask first, the agreements to aim for, pitfalls to avoid, and the alignment map across all 12 dimensions.
View full sample report